feat(byte_sub_ptr): add ptr::byte_sub_ptr

This is an API that naturally should exist as a combination of byte_offset_from and sub_ptr both existing (they showed up at similar times so this union was never made). Adding these is a logical (and perhaps final) precondition of stabilizing ptr_sub_ptr (rust-lang#95892).

…constraint, r=compiler-errors

Rename HIR `TypeBinding` to `AssocItemConstraint` and related cleanup

Rename `hir::TypeBinding` and `ast::AssocConstraint` to `AssocItemConstraint` and update all items and locals using the old terminology.

Motivation: The terminology *type binding* is extremely outdated. "Type bindings" not only include constraints on associated *types* but also on associated *constants* (feature `associated_const_equality`) and on RPITITs of associated *functions* (feature `return_type_notation`). Hence the word *item* in the new name. Furthermore, the word *binding* commonly refers to a mapping from a binder/identifier to a "value" for some definition of "value". Its use in "type binding" made sense when equality constraints (e.g., `AssocTy = Ty`) were the only kind of associated item constraint. Nowadays however, we also have *associated type bounds* (e.g., `AssocTy: Bound`) for which the term *binding* doesn't make sense.

---

Old terminology (HIR, rustdoc):

```
`TypeBinding`: (associated) type binding
├── `Constraint`: associated type bound
└── `Equality`: (associated) equality constraint (?)
    ├── `Ty`: (associated) type binding
    └── `Const`: associated const equality (constraint)
```

Old terminology (AST, abbrev.):

```
`AssocConstraint`
├── `Bound`
└── `Equality`
    ├── `Ty`
    └── `Const`
```

New terminology (AST, HIR, rustdoc):

```
`AssocItemConstraint`: associated item constraint
├── `Bound`: associated type bound
└── `Equality`: associated item equality constraint OR associated item binding (for short)
    ├── `Ty`: associated type equality constraint OR associated type binding (for short)
    └── `Const`: associated const equality constraint OR associated const binding (for short)
```

r? compiler-errors

Align `Term` methods with `GenericArg` methods, add `Term::expect_*`

* `Term::ty` -> `Term::as_type`.
* `Term::ct` -> `Term::as_const`.
* Adds `Term::expect_type` and `Term::expect_const`, and uses them in favor of `.ty().unwrap()`, etc.

I could also shorten these to `as_ty` and then do `GenericArg::as_ty` as well, but I do think the `as_` is important to signal that this is a conversion method, and not a getter, like `Const::ty` is.

r? types

…r=lcnr

Fold item bounds before proving them in `check_type_bounds` in new solver

Vaguely confident that this is sufficient to prevent rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#46 and rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#62.

This is not the "correct" solution, but will probably suffice until coinduction, at which point we implement the right solution (`check_type_bounds` must prove `Assoc<...> alias-eq ConcreteType`, normalizing requires proving item bounds).

r? lcnr